01-03-2008, 09:02 AM
True:
When I wrote my previous post I started with a dicussion on symmantics, re-read your previous post, determined it wasn't a matter of symmantics, and edited my reply. Now, again, I think it was just symmantics. I think you use "accept" the way I would use "acknowledge". You did not imply a judgement when I thought you did. If that is right, then I agree, Acknowledgement is the first step. Then you have to decide whether or not you will go along with it.
My hopes and desires are corrupted by my arrogance and my fear. I can't trust what I want. My behavior is to be determined by whim, or by probability analysis.
By the way, I am not a probability expert. If I make errors in my math, who cares? The point is to avoid fear and arrogance.
When I wrote my previous post I started with a dicussion on symmantics, re-read your previous post, determined it wasn't a matter of symmantics, and edited my reply. Now, again, I think it was just symmantics. I think you use "accept" the way I would use "acknowledge". You did not imply a judgement when I thought you did. If that is right, then I agree, Acknowledgement is the first step. Then you have to decide whether or not you will go along with it.
My hopes and desires are corrupted by my arrogance and my fear. I can't trust what I want. My behavior is to be determined by whim, or by probability analysis.
By the way, I am not a probability expert. If I make errors in my math, who cares? The point is to avoid fear and arrogance.