Mensajes: 63
	Temas: 4
	Registro en: Aug 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		I went and checked the terms: 
The Power of Silence, p. 78 (Washington Square Press -version):
Don Juan explained to me that ruthlessness, cunning, patience and sweetness were the essence of stalking.
My worst area is the patience. I have none what so ever. Sweetness is possible sometimes, ruthlessness comes to me if I just can't care anymore about a certain thing or person. Cunning... maby sometimes. 
But one should learn to live these things, to breath them in and out of him/herself...
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 70
	Temas: 11
	Registro en: Aug 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		I agree with firefox, and I've found that my definitions of those words (the moods) progress. The important thing is to apply them in whatever form, and make the corrections on an on going basis. At first I used the moods as a license to do whatever I wanted and not feel remorse. I did this more out of ignorance or maybe as a kind of reflexive action due to the habitual position of my assemblege point. Then I realized that I had to perfect it on the self before it could be used effectivly on other people. Energy is energy, sometimes it carries me away quite a distance until I become aware of it and consciously change it's direction, this takes time.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 63
	Temas: 4
	Registro en: Aug 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		Well, I haven't exactly been practising those feelings deliberately. I just have made my observations after some certain situation is over... (How did I behave and what was my inner feeling and so on.)
 :lol: 
I don't know if one should forcefully try to have those feelings. Or do they come around naturally when one is being impeccable?
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 156
	Temas: 32
	Registro en: Oct 2007
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		Greetings,
I'm jumping in late here, so bare with me (intentional spelling pun).
Lying is most certainly a part of stalking and stalking oneself. If you'll recall, DJ instructs CC to lie to others and himself until he no longer knows what's true and what's lie. CC says he doesn't like to deceive people and DJ says we deceive everyone anyway - something like that. If anyone wishes, I'll take the time to find the exact quote. This, to me, relates to their conversation about personal history when CC says "Well surely you know who you are, DJ - don't you?" And DJ replies, "Sure I..... don't." 
To put all that together, lying and telling the truth are relative - they're only valid (maybe CC would use the term applicability) in reference or context of some other time or event. So basically, to tell the truth or a lie (why is it always the truth and a lie?  :blink: ) you have to carry your past with you and keep reaffirming it, re-presenting it; you have to keep your personal history alive. 
So one needs to see the direct connection between honesty and personal history, or dishonesty and personal history. You see, the emphasis, for a warrior anyways, shouldn't be on honesty or dishonesty, both are personal history - both require you to maintain an idea of yourself and thus be anchored in the past. The emphasis is to free yourself of the self - to be free of personal history. Warriors are not moral. Their impeccability is strictly a matter of saving energy. And it requires more energy to drag your past around (a "good" past or a "bad" past) than to be present. 
On the other hand, if you're going to live in the world and relate to others in business and relationships, etc, you're probably going to have to practice honesty to a large degree. You're going to have to have a consistent idea of self to present to those people or they won't tolerate you for long.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 205
	Temas: 16
	Registro en: Sep 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		i would add that while yes, warriors are not moral beings, we must live life with honor.
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Mensajes: 174
	Temas: 42
	Registro en: May 2006
	
Reputación: 
0
		
	 
 
	
	
		when one does not know them self, then it is easier to lie.  They have an, lets call it an "agreement" with their self.  If they lie then it doesn't have to be real and if it's not real then it's not presant (it's future-fantacy-that's come from a so called harmed or hurt past) and if it's not presant then the person is lost in another realm of reality.  To stalk ones self and to see "when" he/she is lying.  They will at least, in my past, will see that it comes from fear.  Regardless of wether it's right or wrong... says that a person is ether lying to hide out of fear of rejection or they lie to manipulate (control).  If they stalk them self and see what path the lie comes from, would be grand.  But they should know that if they are ok with lying, than a lying reality they will create. 
I don't see right and wrong in lying.  People do it to feel safe!  But what is safty but another illusion of what we want because we fear we wont get it. we lie because of personal history.  If we are without personal history and are presant, than we naturally become lie free!  Care free.  Silent and Still mind.   
Personal history is what we should stalk in our self.  Start taking notes next time you "feel" an emotion other than oneness or this warmth in yor chest (not to be confused with careing or sympathy).   That feeling can be traced back to another time or memory which goes back further.  Find where the source comes from...Know wether this emotion is worth bringing with you. (recapitulate and let go) :wacko: 
AllWays
	
 
	
	
This user is a merge of users with less than 5 posts or all posts in less than one week. Maybe the merged is more interesting than the original users.
Este usuario es una combinación de usuarios con menos de 5 mensajes o que escribió todo en menos de una semana. Quizá el usuario combinado resulte mas interesante que los usuarios originales.