11-12-2007, 09:35 PM
Hi Ensonar! Same post time, nearly. B)
Chacmools' TV Interview
11-12-2007, 10:59 PM
i'm just saying objectively that the interviewers are douchebags. They think that they are so spiritual. They don't even know what 'spiritual' is.
i think i'm going to rewatch the video. i could use a good laugh at those petty tyr...i mean [/B]UNimpeccable[B] douchebags.
And at the time of this interview, i would think that the Chacmools are all seers. And it sounds like they knew what they wanted to say and when they wanted to say it. Impeccable use of language.
i think i'm going to rewatch the video. i could use a good laugh at those petty tyr...i mean [/B]UNimpeccable[B] douchebags.
And at the time of this interview, i would think that the Chacmools are all seers. And it sounds like they knew what they wanted to say and when they wanted to say it. Impeccable use of language.
11-12-2007, 11:03 PM
Checked out the feedback for the video and came across this one, describing the Path (page 2)
"It is scrambling around in the dark, trying to find matches to light a lamp no one knows the location of."
"It is scrambling around in the dark, trying to find matches to light a lamp no one knows the location of."
11-13-2007, 07:51 PM
Well maybe not all of my time, but just some of it, if he or she happens to practice his or her douchebaggery in front of me. I would expect the same of those witnessing my douchebaggery as well of course!and how will you act if you met douchebag, but your point of wiev is: "he is impeccable"?
the douchebag are doing his stuff, but you looking at him like at impeccable warrior.
what will be different?
11-13-2007, 08:26 PM
There would be no difference in the way i would act because i would not PRETEND that these people are impeccable warriors.
What if the Don Juan Matus when telling his story of how the Nagual Julian made him into a Warrior acted as if his tyranical boss (at the sugar mill) was an impeccable warrior (erroreously of course)? The boss was just a petty tyrant and Don Juan treated him as such and he got what was coming to him.
These people conducting the interview are nothing more than petty tyrants. And if they were to try to convince the Chacmools of their view of the world, the Chacmools would have laughed at them for sure. As we all just laugh at the puniness and stupidity of the average man.
What if the Don Juan Matus when telling his story of how the Nagual Julian made him into a Warrior acted as if his tyranical boss (at the sugar mill) was an impeccable warrior (erroreously of course)? The boss was just a petty tyrant and Don Juan treated him as such and he got what was coming to him.
These people conducting the interview are nothing more than petty tyrants. And if they were to try to convince the Chacmools of their view of the world, the Chacmools would have laughed at them for sure. As we all just laugh at the puniness and stupidity of the average man.
11-13-2007, 10:54 PM
and how will you act if you met douchebag, but your point of wiev is: "he is impeccable"?I'm not sure this will answer your question, but it makes me want to answer you on several different layers.
the douchebag are doing his stuff, but you looking at him like at impeccable warrior.
what will be different?
On the one hand, it seems obvious that the two interviewers were air-headed new-age types who feel that they are some of the most spiritual beings around, or at least want others to feel that they are. Why the chacmools decided to present themselves on such a weak program is beyond me. But I would assume that the chacmools were at least aware enough to see the sillyness of the two interviewers just as we all are seeing it now. However, they kept their composure and didn't laugh at them directly, call them douchebags, or anything of that nature. They had a purpose to attend to, and they took care of that and didn't bother with anything else.
Don Juan made fun of and embarrased Carlos all the time in Castaneda's books. However, I'm sure that in don Juan's dealings with the daily world, he didn't go around making fun of and embarrasing every silly idiot he came across. It wouldn't serve his purpose to have done so.
Another level to this however, is related to the fact that I said it seems obvious that the interviewers were douchebags. I certainly don't doubt that at times you could say that the nagual Julian, Genaro, Ziola, and many many others intentionally acted like douchebags, assholes, or whatever. I'm not saying that there's much of a chance that the interviewers were impeccable warriors acting like new-age goofballs. But your question made me want to point out the fact that an impeccable warrior just might use douchebaggery at times if it serves his or her purpose.
11-14-2007, 01:33 AM
"On the one hand, it seems obvious that the two interviewers were air-headed new-age.."
lets use logic correctly
the only thing that is obvious is that two magical beeings had enough energy to met other tree magical beings))
everything else is just crap that holds your assambled point stand still.
my english is crapish, i asked to change point position. to play the situation.
not to do some intelectual thinking
lets use logic correctly
the only thing that is obvious is that two magical beeings had enough energy to met other tree magical beings)) everything else is just crap that holds your assambled point stand still.
my english is crapish
, i asked to change point position. to play the situation.not to do some intelectual thinking
« Tema anterior | Tema siguiente »
Usuarios navegando en este tema: 1 invitado(s)