02-05-2008, 05:43 AM
Hi Silk!
Hmmm. Are we not trapped by the rules of convention to speak of potential?
This entire conversation is centered around universal intent which seems to be a potential and not what is. That's what I'm trying to clarify - since for you one can go against universal intent, then it is potential. So WE are talking about potential, not just me. And thus WE are reasoning and measuring and analysing and interpreting, because this topic calls for it because we are talking about the potential of being aligned with universal intent.
Isn't it universal intent that we have these brains and that we are more than just instinct? Are you suggesting to skim the emanations and just use the instinct part and then we will be aligned with universal intent?
Sorry if I've misinterpreted. It's been a while and I may not be refreshed on our conversation.
true
Hmmm. Are we not trapped by the rules of convention to speak of potential?
This entire conversation is centered around universal intent which seems to be a potential and not what is. That's what I'm trying to clarify - since for you one can go against universal intent, then it is potential. So WE are talking about potential, not just me. And thus WE are reasoning and measuring and analysing and interpreting, because this topic calls for it because we are talking about the potential of being aligned with universal intent.
Isn't it universal intent that we have these brains and that we are more than just instinct? Are you suggesting to skim the emanations and just use the instinct part and then we will be aligned with universal intent?
Sorry if I've misinterpreted. It's been a while and I may not be refreshed on our conversation.
true