11-28-2007, 01:41 PM
Well, what I notice is that in this last post you say I'm talking about the obvious and in your post before that you call non-duality an idea and speak of the use of aiming towards it.
Is the existence of the Nagual (as source, not leader of a group) another idea that you like and think could be useful?
Non-duality (Oneness) is what's left when all ideas are absent. The Nagual is what's left when the tonal is absent.
I don't think you're impatient. I think you're not interested. I think your lack of interest may be based on a conclusion you've made, an opinion you believe is more than just a description.
In the moment, thoughts like "heart" and "book" don't arise. I'm not being either. They're concepts that come afterwards due to thinking. "Successful", "more concise", "less pedantic"... sincerely, you're not getting the obvious. You've probably heard a million times that a warrior isn't concerned with success or failure, but you're still thinking in terms of them.
Why do you think it hasn't "gotten through"?
Is the existence of the Nagual (as source, not leader of a group) another idea that you like and think could be useful?
Non-duality (Oneness) is what's left when all ideas are absent. The Nagual is what's left when the tonal is absent.
I don't think you're impatient. I think you're not interested. I think your lack of interest may be based on a conclusion you've made, an opinion you believe is more than just a description.
In the moment, thoughts like "heart" and "book" don't arise. I'm not being either. They're concepts that come afterwards due to thinking. "Successful", "more concise", "less pedantic"... sincerely, you're not getting the obvious. You've probably heard a million times that a warrior isn't concerned with success or failure, but you're still thinking in terms of them.
Why do you think it hasn't "gotten through"?